<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?><rss version="2.0" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:thr="http://purl.org/syndication/thread/1.0" xmlns:activity="http://activitystrea.ms/spec/1.0/" xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/" xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"><channel><title>Newsvine</title><link>http://newrevolutionnow.newsvine.com/</link><description>New Revolution Now</description><language>en-us</language><copyright>Copyright 2013</copyright><lastBuildDate>Thu, 19 Aug 2010 14:27:21 +0000</lastBuildDate><pubDate>Fri, 24 May 2013 00:21:52 +0000</pubDate><generator>http://www.newsvine.com</generator><docs>http://blogs.law.harvard.edu/tech/rss</docs><item><title>A Republic -- If We Can Keep It</title>
<description><![CDATA[ At the conclusion of the Constitutional Convention of 1787 in Philadelphia, as the delegates filed out of the hall, a Mrs.]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[NewRevolutionNow]]></dc:creator><source><![CDATA[NewRevolutionNow]]></source><link>http://newrevolutionnow.newsvine.com/_news/2010/08/18/4919193-a-republic-if-we-can-keep-it</link><guid>http://newrevolutionnow.newsvine.com/_news/2010/08/18/4919193-a-republic-if-we-can-keep-it</guid><category>congress</category><category>james</category><category>politics</category><category>constitutional</category><category>american</category><category>citizen</category><category>republican</category><category>governance</category><category>madison</category><category>self</category><pubDate>Wed, 18 Aug 2010 09:33:14 +0000</pubDate><activity:verb>http://activitystrea.ms/schema/1.0/post</activity:verb><activity:object-type>http://activitystrea.ms/schema/1.0/generic_post</activity:object-type></item><item><title>AZ Immigration Law SB1070 Rests with &quot;We the People&quot;</title>
<description><![CDATA[In general, I see the Arizona law as a reaction to the national government's refusal to enforce "the people's" duly enacted laws on illegal immigration.]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[NewRevolutionNow]]></dc:creator><source><![CDATA[NewRevolutionNow]]></source><link>http://newrevolutionnow.newsvine.com/_news/2010/07/29/4777933-az-immigration-law-sb1070-rests-with-we-the-people</link><guid>http://newrevolutionnow.newsvine.com/_news/2010/07/29/4777933-az-immigration-law-sb1070-rests-with-we-the-people</guid><category>arizona</category><category>immigration</category><category>politics</category><category>judge</category><category>az</category><category>bolton</category><category>federal</category><category>pac</category><category>sb</category><category>susan</category><category>1070</category><category>sb1070</category><category>nrnpac</category><category>nrn</category><pubDate>Thu, 29 Jul 2010 16:13:23 +0000</pubDate><activity:verb>http://activitystrea.ms/schema/1.0/post</activity:verb><activity:object-type>http://activitystrea.ms/schema/1.0/generic_post</activity:object-type></item><item><title>DOJ v. AZ</title>
<description><![CDATA[Accusing Arizona of trying to "second guess" the federal government, the Justice Department on Tuesday filed a lawsuit challenging the state's immigration policy — claiming the "invalid" law interferes with federal immigration responsibilities and "must be struck do&nbsp;&hellip;]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[NewRevolutionNow]]></dc:creator><source><![CDATA[NewRevolutionNow]]></source><link>http://newrevolutionnow.newsvine.com/_news/2010/07/07/4631665-doj-v-az</link><guid>http://newrevolutionnow.newsvine.com/_news/2010/07/07/4631665-doj-v-az</guid><category>politics</category><pubDate>Wed, 7 Jul 2010 17:29:29 +0000</pubDate><activity:verb>http://activitystrea.ms/schema/1.0/post</activity:verb><activity:object-type>http://activitystrea.ms/schema/1.0/bookmark</activity:object-type></item><item><title>Scamming Granma and Granpa</title>
<description><![CDATA[In the Age of Bambam I have been translating popular terms so that I can actually understand them. The word misspoke is a codeword for lied. Biodegradable means made to fall apart. I've even collected an entire liberal lexicon as a kind of revenge against the oppressor.]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[NewRevolutionNow]]></dc:creator><source><![CDATA[NewRevolutionNow]]></source><link>http://newrevolutionnow.newsvine.com/_news/2010/05/03/4236746-scamming-granma-and-granpa</link><guid>http://newrevolutionnow.newsvine.com/_news/2010/05/03/4236746-scamming-granma-and-granpa</guid><category>politics</category><category>scam</category><category>senior</category><category>citizens</category><pubDate>Mon, 3 May 2010 17:49:32 +0000</pubDate><activity:verb>http://activitystrea.ms/schema/1.0/post</activity:verb><activity:object-type>http://activitystrea.ms/schema/1.0/bookmark</activity:object-type></item><item><title>Top 10 dumbest things said about the Arizona immigration law</title>
<description><![CDATA[The last few days have seen an extraordinary outburst of criticism of Arizona's new immigration law.  In the nation's elite media outlets, its most respected commentators are portraying the law as an act of police-state repression.]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[NewRevolutionNow]]></dc:creator><source><![CDATA[NewRevolutionNow]]></source><link>http://newrevolutionnow.newsvine.com/_news/2010/05/01/4229796-top-10-dumbest-things-said-about-the-arizona-immigration-law</link><guid>http://newrevolutionnow.newsvine.com/_news/2010/05/01/4229796-top-10-dumbest-things-said-about-the-arizona-immigration-law</guid><category>new</category><category>immigration</category><category>politics</category><category>law</category><category>arizona-s</category><pubDate>Sat, 1 May 2010 17:18:16 +0000</pubDate><activity:verb>http://activitystrea.ms/schema/1.0/post</activity:verb><activity:object-type>http://activitystrea.ms/schema/1.0/bookmark</activity:object-type></item><item><title>Slaughter Rule Unconstitutional</title>
<description><![CDATA[ Clarice Feldman * March 15, 2010

 Stanford Professor Michael McConnell, writing in the Wall Street Journal, argues that the Slaughter Rule end run is unconstitutional:]]></description>
<dc:creator><![CDATA[NewRevolutionNow]]></dc:creator><source><![CDATA[NewRevolutionNow]]></source><link>http://newrevolutionnow.newsvine.com/_news/2010/03/16/4024400-slaughter-rule-unconstitutional</link><guid>http://newrevolutionnow.newsvine.com/_news/2010/03/16/4024400-slaughter-rule-unconstitutional</guid><category>constitution</category><category>politics</category><category>slaughter</category><pubDate>Tue, 16 Mar 2010 09:56:35 +0000</pubDate><activity:verb>http://activitystrea.ms/schema/1.0/post</activity:verb><activity:object-type>http://activitystrea.ms/schema/1.0/generic_post</activity:object-type></item></channel></rss>